CEDAR BLUFF, Ala.– Cedar Bluff Planning Commission Chairman Bill Holland led the commission through a lengthy agenda on Thursday evening, covering zoning recommendations and potential ordinance updates during the group’s latest meeting.

The commission moved forward with several zoning recommendations for the Town Council, while also reviewing proposed changes involving fencing regulations, pool setbacks, camper restrictions, subdivision standards and animal-related concerns.

Commercial Zoning Recommended for Marina and Resort

The commission addressed the need to formally recommend zoning classifications for several properties.

Properties discussed included:

• J.R. Marina on County Road 44

• Three River Resort, also on County Road 44

• Additional property near Highway 9

Commission members stated the marina and resort properties align with a C-2 commercial zoning designation.

A motion was made and seconded to recommend C-2 zoning for the properties. A roll call vote was requested, and members responded unanimously in favor.

The recommendation now moves to the Town Council for final consideration.

Commission members also referenced rural residential classifications for other properties under review, emphasizing that each parcel should reflect its current use and long-term development plans.

Zoning Map and Ordinances Available Online

Holland reminded residents that the updated zoning map is available for public viewing on the Cedar Bluff website.

In addition:

• The full Cedar Bluff building ordinance is posted online.

• A categorized summary of town ordinances is available.

• Residents with questions about zoning or ordinances may contact town officials for assistance.

Commission members emphasized transparency and encouraged property owners to review how their parcels are currently zoned.

Electric Fence Restrictions Under Consideration

A significant portion of the discussion centered on electric fencing within town limits.

Members expressed concerns about potential liability if electric fencing were permitted in residential or commercial areas, particularly in situations involving children or unintended contact.

Discussion points included:

• Electric fencing would not be permitted as a standalone perimeter fence.

• If allowed, electric wire would need to be installed on the inside of an existing fence.

• Commissioners questioned whether electric fencing is effective for deer control, noting fence height is typically the most reliable deterrent.

• Concerns were raised about possible injury if someone attempted to climb a fence containing live wire.

Holland said draft language is being reviewed, and additional input has been sought from the county animal control officer before final wording is presented at a public hearing.

Animal Control and Exotic Animal Concerns

The commission also discussed animal-related concerns that would require separate ordinances outside of zoning regulations.

Topics included:

• Exotic animals such as monkeys and lemurs

• Venomous snakes kept as pets

• Recent incidents involving aggressive dogs

Officials confirmed an animal control and protection ordinance has already been prepared and is ready for adoption. However, enforcement timing may depend on the completion of the county’s new animal control facility.

Commission members acknowledged ongoing concerns about dangerous dogs and emphasized that responsibility ultimately lies with pet owners.

Pool Fencing and Setback Requirements Debated

The commission reviewed potential updates to pool regulations, particularly fencing requirements and setbacks from property lines.

Members discussed whether a single fenced yard with locked gates should satisfy safety requirements, rather than requiring a second fence directly around the pool.

Other issues included:

• Removing ladders from above-ground pools when not in use

• Ensuring deck access to pools can be restricted

• Requiring gates to remain locked

Setbacks generated extended debate. A previously discussed 10-foot setback from property lines was considered too restrictive by several members, especially for smaller lots. Some commissioners suggested a setback of two to four feet may be more reasonable.

Holland indicated revised language will be drafted and presented during a public hearing before final adoption.

Campers and RV Occupancy Rules Reviewed

The commission also reviewed proposed updates concerning campers and recreational vehicles.

Under the proposed language:

• In R-2 zoning districts, campers and RVs would be permitted for seasonal occupancy only when located within a Lakefront Recreational Overlay Zone.

• On non-overlay lots, campers could be parked but would not be permitted to connect to sewer, water, or electrical service for residential use.

• The goal is to prevent long-term residential use of campers outside designated recreational areas.

Commissioners acknowledged there are existing situations where campers are currently being used as residences. Holland noted the intent of the updated language is to guide future placements rather than immediately displace current residents.

Members also discussed limiting the number of campers allowed per lot and how such limits could interact with existing neighborhood covenants that previously permitted multiple units.

Subdivision Regulations Also Under Review

The commission briefly reviewed subdivision regulations, including requirements for physical layouts, infrastructure standards, and road construction before private roads can be turned over to the city.

Holland said additional review of subdivision language will take place in coordination with town leadership.

A public hearing will be scheduled before final ordinance changes are adopted or forwarded to the Town Council.

You can listen to the entire meeting right here: