How Hillary Clinton Got Under Donald Trump's Skin During the Debate

TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/Getty Images(NEW YORK) — One of the big questions Monday night was how Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump would try to goad their opponent into losing his or her cool during their first face-off.

Trump was known for going off on his foes during the primary debates, so the expectations were that Monday night would be no different. And there were several instances where he seemed to come close.

Aaron Kall, the director of debate at the University of Michigan, said he thought Clinton’s attack on his tax returns “was the most effective way in which she” got under his skin.

Clinton suggested a few reasons Trump might be refusing to release his returns, and he couldn’t stop himself from complimenting his implied efforts to pay no federal income taxes.

“He’s very protective of his image and of his bravado and so when you attack someone on his perceived strengths — his business acumen — then he’s going to get very defensive when that’s on the table,” Kall told ABC News.

Kall also pointed to Clinton’s invoking Michelle Obama’s convention speech as another subtle jab, because the first lady is not only a popular figure on both sides of the aisle but also because of the controversy that surrounded the Melania Trump convention speech that echoed one of the first lady’s earlier speeches.

Kall called the reference “politically smart and it also could potentially aid in getting under his skin.”

James Campbell, a professor of political science at the University at Buffalo who has written a book about political polarization, said it was clear that he was bothered by some of the topics that came up.

“I’m not sure whether Trump went off the rails because of Clinton, the moderator, or just his personality. The contrast to me of how the candidates dealt with personally related problems was stark,” Campbell told ABC News.

“Clinton dismissed the most serious charges regarding her private email servers being a possible breach of national security by simply apologizing for it. One ‘Oops’ and then the issue is gone — at least for this debate. Smart move if you can get away with it, which she did,” he said.

“Trump, on the other hand, is so aggressive and unapologetic that he relitigates issues — birtherism, Iraq War opposition — that he has no possibility of winning on. As a result, he is on the defensive longer and highlights his problems.”

Copyright © 2016, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email
Share on print
Print